Model comparison
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Qwen Turbo
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 36.6 to 14.5.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.5 | 26.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-09 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 30K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1458 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | — |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106), Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1441 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1456 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1430 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Qwen Turbo?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.