Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 39.4 to 9.3.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent specifications
Gemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderGooglexAI
Noometry Index27.346.2
Released2023-12-132026-03-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked2420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Coding11081457
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Search—1204

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Hard Prompts11091448
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
DTBench45.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04—

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Math11321442
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Expert10591445
GPQA Diamond34%—
MMLU70%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English11381440
LMArena Chinese11241475
LMArena French11451466
LMArena German11251456
LMArena Japanese10231405
LMArena Russian11861457
LMArena Spanish11191447
LMArena Korean—1416

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following11141420

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query11321431

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text11491450
LMArena Creative Writing11311436
LMArena Multi-Turn11391452

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper