Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 39.4 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 46.2 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2026-03-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1457 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1448 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1445 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1475 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1466 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1405 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1447 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1420 |
Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1431 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1436 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1452 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.