Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Mixtral 8x7B

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Mixtral 8x7B costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

45.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

26.8

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 64.1 to 34.4.
  • Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper at $0.70 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 32K.
  • Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Mixtral 8x7B specifications
Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentMixtral 8x7B
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Noometry Index45.526.8
Released2026-03-092023-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M32K
Max output30K32K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$0.70
Results tracked2038

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.2 (#265)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Coding14581127
HumanEval+—39.6%
MBPP+—49.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Mixtral 8x7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Search1204—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44), Mixtral 8x7B: 17.4 (#283)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Hard Prompts14481115
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
DTBench—49.6%
Adversarial NLI—55.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.38
ForecastBench—56.3
HellaSwag—86.7%
PIQA—83.6%
WinoGrande—77.2%

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106), Mixtral 8x7B: 17.2 (#284)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Math14411147
Omni-MATH—10.5%
MATH Level 5—10%
GSM8K—74.4%

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#296)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Expert14451088
GPQA Diamond—30.6%
MMLU-Pro—33.5%
GPQA (HELM)—29.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—87.3%
MMLU—70.6%
OpenBookQA—85.8%
TriviaQA—82.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44), Mixtral 8x7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Non-English14401077
LMArena Chinese14751055
LMArena French14671165
LMArena German14561114
LMArena Japanese1405931
LMArena Korean1416968
LMArena Russian14571090
LMArena Spanish14471110

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.2 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Instruction Following14201110
IFEval—57.5%

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Longer Query14301103

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.4 (#265)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Text14501132
LMArena Creative Writing14351109
LMArena Multi-Turn14511115
WildBench—67.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Mixtral 8x7B?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Mixtral 8x7B costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Mixtral 8x7B?

Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 32K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Mixtral 8x7B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper