Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 28.9.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Vision 1.5
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index46.243.1
Released2026-03-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked209

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Coding14571418

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Search1204—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14481416
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Math1442—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Expert1445—

Multimodal Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Vision12591180

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Non-English14401382
LMArena Chinese1475—
LMArena French1466—
LMArena German1456—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1416—
LMArena Russian1457—
LMArena Spanish1447—

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Instruction Following14201397

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Longer Query14311404

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Text14501405
LMArena Creative Writing14361388
LMArena Multi-Turn14521422

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper