Model comparison

GLM-5 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.9 to 42.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

45.9

Rank #59 Confirmed

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

42.6

Rank #95 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5 scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-5 leads 49.0 to 41.2.
  • GLM-5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 specifications
GLM-5Hunyuan Vision 1.5
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index45.942.6
Released2026-02-11—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1—
Output $ / M tokens$3.20—
Results tracked459

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 49.0 (#47), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Coding14611419
SWE-bench Verified72.1%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)72.8%—
LMArena WebDev1434—
SWE-bench Multilingual69.7%—
WeirdML48.2%—
ALE-Bench765.62—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5: 30.9 (#65), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Terminal-Bench52.4%—
τ²-bench Airline82.5%—
τ²-bench Banking9.8%—
τ²-bench Retail73.7%—
τ²-bench Telecom86.8%—
Vending-Bench 24,432—

Reasoning Too close to call

GLM-5: 27.6 (#100), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14511417
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench53.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.8%—
ARC-AGI-144.7%—
Chess Puzzles10%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.84—
ForecastBench61—

Math Not comparable

GLM-5: 44.8 (#66), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Vision 1.5
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions65.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—
LMArena Math1440—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)16.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5: 52.2 (#59), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Vision 1.5
GPQA Diamond87.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.1%—
LMArena Expert1454—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Vision—1180

Multilingual GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 53.9 (#57), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Non-English14301383
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1455—
LMArena German1445—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1421—
LMArena Russian1436—
LMArena Spanish1452—

Instruction Following GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 75.4 (#64), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Instruction Following14271398

Long Context GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 44.6 (#58), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Longer Query14461405
CL-bench18.7%—

Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads

GLM-5: 66.2 (#38), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Text14461407
LMArena Creative Writing14381389
LMArena Multi-Turn14561423
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1601—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.9 to 42.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 41.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5 has 45 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper