Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 38.9 to 28.9.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 46.4 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 272K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1418 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1416 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.28 | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1397 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 Pro or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.