Model comparison
GLM-4.5-Air vs Grok 4.1 Fast
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 42.3 to 23.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Vectara Hallucination Rate: 9.3% for GLM-4.5-Air and 17.8% for Grok 4.1 Fast.
- Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper at $0.20 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.20 / $1.10 for GLM-4.5-Air.
- GLM-4.5-Air accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
- GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5-Air | Grok 4.1 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2025-07-20 | 2025-06-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | 128K |
| Max output | 98K | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.20 | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.10 | $0.50 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.5-Air: 34.5 (#225), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.8 (#236)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1397 | 1411 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1241 |
| GSO | 2.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 394.93 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.5-Air: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.1 (#35)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 69.6% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,107 |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads
GLM-4.5-Air: 23.3 (#166), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.3 (#45)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1379 | 1407 |
| ForecastBench | 59.2 | 61 |
| SimpleBench | — | 56% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 87.4% |
| DTBench | — | 87.7% |
Math GLM-4.5-Air leads
GLM-4.5-Air: 33.8 (#166), Grok 4.1 Fast: 30.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
| Omni-MATH | 39.1% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.5-Air leads
GLM-4.5-Air: 34.6 (#184), Grok 4.1 Fast: 32.6 (#203)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1370 | 1398 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 76.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 59.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5-Air: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#71)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1201 |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads
GLM-4.5-Air: 49.4 (#130), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.1 (#110)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1366 | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1399 | 1416 |
| LMArena German | 1376 | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1348 | 1347 |
| LMArena Korean | 1306 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1385 | 1411 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads
GLM-4.5-Air: 69.8 (#165), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.8 (#127)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1353 | 1376 |
| IFEval | 81.2% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#130), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#121)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1367 | 1390 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads
GLM-4.5-Air: 56.1 (#134), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.4 (#126)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Grok 4.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1384 | 1408 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1343 | 1394 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | 1389 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1327 |
| WildBench | 78.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5-Air or Grok 4.1 Fast?
Grok 4.1 Fast is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; GLM-4.5-Air lists at $0.20 and $1.10.
Is GLM-4.5-Air or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (34.5 vs 33.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
GLM-4.5-Air does, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Grok 4.1 Fast share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.