Model comparison

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning NVIDIA

40.0

Rank #155 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 specifications
Nemotron 3.5 LightningQwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index40.038.8
Released2026-08-11—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.20—
Results tracked1814

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding13751314

Reasoning Too close to call

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts13371299

Math Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math13591298

Knowledge Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert13561289

Multilingual Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English12951265
LMArena Chinese13591314
LMArena German12821231
LMArena Japanese12061207
LMArena Russian12531271
LMArena French1366—
LMArena Korean1238—
LMArena Spanish1345—

Instruction Following Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following13181275

Long Context Too close to call

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query13141292

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 LightningQwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text13271299
LMArena Creative Writing12541262
LMArena Multi-Turn13281299
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1280—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper