Model comparison
Grok 3 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 5 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 78.8% for Grok 3 and 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 40 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | 15.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1391 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | 31.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | — |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena German | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 88.4% | 73% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 84.9% | 68.9% |
| LMArena Text | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 3 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 3 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.