Model comparison
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads 37.5 to 18.3.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 40.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-08-11 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 40.4 (#141), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1375 | — |
Reasoning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 26.8 (#127), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1337 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#155), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |
Knowledge Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 37.5 (#154), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1356 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 44.0 (#180), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena French | 1366 | — |
| LMArena German | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1238 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1253 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1345 | — |
Instruction Following Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 69.6 (#170), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1318 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 39.9 (#165), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1314 | — |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 48.5 (#201), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3.5 Lightning | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1327 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1254 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1280 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1328 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Nemotron 3.5 Lightning or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3.5 Lightning and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has 18 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.