Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Llama 2-13B

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.6

Rank #309 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Grok-3 mini leads 78.5 to 53.3.
  • Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Llama 2-13B specifications
Grok-3 miniLlama 2-13B
ProviderxAIMeta
Noometry Index41.229.6
Released2025-04-092023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3532

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 2-13B
LMArena Coding13791062
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
WeirdML42.6%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 2-13B
LMArena Hard Prompts13751051
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35106.17
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—42.2%
BIG-Bench Hard—58.2%
HellaSwag—80.7%
LAMBADA—76.5%
PIQA—80.8%
WinoGrande—72.8%

Math Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 2-13B
LMArena Math13861065
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
Omni-MATH31.8%—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—
GSM8K—36.9%

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 2-13B
LMArena Expert13951030
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.3%
BoolQ—82.4%
MMLU—55.6%
OpenBookQA—57%
TriviaQA—79.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: —, Llama 2-13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 2-13B
ScienceQA—55.8%

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 2-13B
LMArena Non-English13521024
LMArena Chinese13871001
LMArena French13571044
LMArena German13491009
LMArena Japanese1342894
LMArena Korean1335953
LMArena Russian13531055
LMArena Spanish13811087

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 2-13B
LMArena Instruction Following13571045
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 2-13B
LMArena Longer Query13721064
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniLlama 2-13B
LMArena Text13701084
LMArena Creative Writing13421047
LMArena Multi-Turn13551050
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Llama 2-13B?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Llama 2-13B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper