Model comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Grok-3 mini
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Opus scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok-3 mini leads 42.1 to 14.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.7% for Claude 3 Opus and 77.8% for Grok-3 mini.
Side by side
| Claude 3 Opus | Grok-3 mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 41.2 |
| Released | 2024-02-29 | 2025-04-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 46 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok-3 mini leads
Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267), Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 19.2% | 42.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1264 | 1379 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 49.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.4% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 77.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 73.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116), Grok-3 mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3 Opus leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324), Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1245 | 1375 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 126.91 | 140.35 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.4% |
| SimpleBench | 23.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 16.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 40.6% | — |
| DTBench | 61.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | — |
| LMCA | 17% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| LiveBench | 49.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 88.5% | — |
Math Grok-3 mini leads
Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299), Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.7% | 77.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1386 |
| MATH Level 5 | 37.5% | 90.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 31.8% |
| LiveBench Math | 43.6% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 5.9% |
Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads
Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267), Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.2% | 76.3% |
| Confabulations | 22.7% | 10.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1395 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 79.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.5% |
| MMLU | 84.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116), Grok-3 mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1023 | — |
Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads
Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207), Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1258 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1248 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | 1275 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1204 | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | 1187 | 1335 |
| LMArena Russian | 1280 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1246 | 1381 |
Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads
Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228), Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1248 | 1357 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 63.9% | — |
| IFEval | — | 95.1% |
Long Context Grok-3 mini leads
Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202), Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1259 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads
Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213), Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | Claude 3 Opus | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1262 | 1370 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1342 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1355 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.5% |
| WildBench | — | 65.1% |
| LiveBench Language | 50.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3 Opus better than Grok-3 mini?
Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3 Opus or Grok-3 mini better for coding?
Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Opus and Grok-3 mini share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Opus has 46 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.