Model comparison
Grok-3 mini vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 41.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 27.8 to 13.8.
Side by side
| Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.0 | 42.6 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 35 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | 1419 |
| Aider Polyglot | 49.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1417 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 16.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.35 | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 77.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 31.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1386 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 90.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 79.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 67.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | 1383 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1387 | — |
| LMArena French | 1357 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1343 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1379 | — |
Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1356 | 1398 |
| IFEval | 95.1% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1372 | 1405 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1370 | 1407 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1342 | 1389 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1423 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| WildBench | 65.1% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-3 mini better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 41.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok-3 mini or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.4 vs 41.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.