Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Grok-3 mini

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 41.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

42.6

Rank #96 Confirmed

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.0

Rank #130 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 5 categories and Grok-3 mini in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads 25.7 to 13.8.
  • DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Grok-3 mini specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGrok-3 mini
ProviderDeepSeekxAI
Noometry Index42.641.0
Released2025-09-222025-04-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window164K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1—
Results tracked1635

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 41.5 (#114), Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGrok-3 mini
LMArena Coding14261380
Aider Polyglot—49.3%
SciCode40.6%—
WeirdML—42.6%
ALE-Bench745.17—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 25.7 (#126), Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGrok-3 mini
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%61.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14271374
ARC-AGI-2—0.4%
ARC-AGI-1—16.5%
CritPt1.7%—
DTBench81.3%—
LMCA28.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—140.35

Math Grok-3 mini leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 35.7 (#138), Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGrok-3 mini
LMArena Math14021386
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—77.8%
Omni-MATH—31.8%
MATH Level 5—90.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—5.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGrok-3 mini
GPQA Diamond—76.3%
MMLU-Pro—79.9%
Confabulations—10.8%
GPQA (HELM)—67.5%
LMArena Expert—1395

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.3 (#87), Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGrok-3 mini
LMArena Non-English14071352
LMArena Russian14341352
LMArena Chinese—1387
LMArena French—1357
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1343
LMArena Korean—1336
LMArena Spanish—1379

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.4 (#96), Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGrok-3 mini
LMArena Instruction Following14061356
IFEval—95.1%

Long Context DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.5 (#88), Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGrok-3 mini
LMArena Longer Query14261372
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.3 (#87), Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusGrok-3 mini
LMArena Text14201370
LMArena Creative Writing14041342
LMArena Multi-Turn14111355
Short-Story Creative Writing—73.5%
WildBench—65.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Grok-3 mini?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 41.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Grok-3 mini better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Grok-3 mini share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper