Model comparison
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Ring-2.6-1T
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has enough public results to be ranked (#233); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 25.3 to 16.4.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Ring-2.6-1T leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 32.9 (#254), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 46.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.4 (#294), Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 22.7% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 54.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | — |
| DTBench | 65.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 54.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.48 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 19.6 (#278), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 11.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 54.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1283 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 63.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#225), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 53.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.3 (#183), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | — |
| LMArena French | 1317 | — |
| LMArena German | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1237 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1281 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 67.1 (#197), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.7 (#186), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.8 (#192), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 63.6% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 45.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has enough public results to be ranked (#233); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.