Model comparison
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 91.8 to 20.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for Claude Opus 5.5 and 11.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024).
Side by side
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 68.6 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $20 | — |
| Results tracked | 44 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 71.9 (#3), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1547 | 1287 |
| FrontierCode | 54.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 57.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1813 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 62.3% | — |
| SciCode | 66.9% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 22.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 46.4% |
| MirrorCode | 77.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,147 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#15), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 73.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 30.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 9,235 | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 80.2 (#3), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1535 | 1272 |
| DTBench | 98.9% | 65.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 167.33 | 130.48 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 93.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 88.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.7% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 71.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 54.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 71% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 54.5% |
| LMCA | 68.2% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 54.3% |
Math Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 91.8 (#3), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 11.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1506 | 1283 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 95% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 54.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.7% |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 2.9% | — |
Knowledge Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 66.4 (#10), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.6% | 53.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1547 | 1254 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 72.2% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 20.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Opus 5.5: 57.8 (#1), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1321 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 51.2% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 83.3% | — |
Multilingual Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 59.1 (#2), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1507 | 1282 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1588 | 1289 |
| LMArena French | 1514 | 1318 |
| LMArena Russian | 1520 | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1507 | 1281 |
| LMArena German | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1244 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1237 |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 80.0 (#3), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1537 | 1270 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 69.6% |
Long Context Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 47.1 (#19), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1532 | 1276 |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5.5 leads
Claude Opus 5.5: 78.2 (#3), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1515 | 1305 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1533 | 1284 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1499 | 1290 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 63.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2050 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 45.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?
Claude Opus 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 68.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?
Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 71.9 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 44 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.