Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 mini vs Ring-2.6-1T

GPT-4.1 mini has enough public results to be ranked (#240); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 mini OpenAI

33.6

Rank #240 Confirmed

Ring-2.6-1T Ant Group (inclusionAI)

36.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 0 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 26.1 to 10.8.
  • Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 miniRing-2.6-1T
ProviderOpenAIAnt Group (inclusionAI)
Noometry Index33.636.9
Released2025-04-142026-05-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$1.60—
Results tracked473

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Ring-2.6-1T leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniRing-2.6-1T
SciCode40.4%42.4%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)23.9%—
Aider Polyglot32.4%—
WeirdML37.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
LMArena Coding1367—
CadEval16%—
ALE-Bench—432.57

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniRing-2.6-1T
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard50.5%—

Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniRing-2.6-1T
CritPt0%3.7%
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark48.6%—
ARC-AGI-13.5%—
Chess Puzzles7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1349—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench68.8%—
LMCA21.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.01—

Math Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniRing-2.6-1T
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)6.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202544.7%—
Omni-MATH49.1%—
LMArena Math1343—
MATH Level 587.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniRing-2.6-1T
GPQA Diamond65.8%—
SimpleQA Verified12.7%—
MMLU-Pro78.3%—
GPQA (HELM)61.4%—
LMArena Expert1338—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Vision1181—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Non-English1318—
LMArena Chinese1329—
LMArena French1358—
LMArena German1351—
LMArena Japanese1290—
LMArena Korean1298—
LMArena Russian1324—
LMArena Spanish1319—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniRing-2.6-1T
IFEval90.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1333—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniRing-2.6-1T
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%—
LMArena Longer Query1344—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199), Ring-2.6-1T: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniRing-2.6-1T
LMArena Text1340—
LMArena Creative Writing1300—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1147—
WildBench83.8%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1354—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Ring-2.6-1T?

GPT-4.1 mini has enough public results to be ranked (#240); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is GPT-4.1 mini or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Ring-2.6-1T share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper