Noometry

Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.5 to 20.8.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index33.741.3
Released2024-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding12871361
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts12721374
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math12831359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert12541339
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English12821363
LMArena Chinese12891417
LMArena French13181391
LMArena German12871355
LMArena Japanese12441342
LMArena Korean12371351
LMArena Russian12861368
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following12701344
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query12761366

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text13051377
LMArena Creative Writing12841359
LMArena Multi-Turn12901387
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper