Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen1.5-72B
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 33.9 to 11.5.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | 1148 |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | 1164 |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
Multilingual Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1286 | 1159 |
| LMArena German | 1273 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1279 | 1110 |
Instruction Following Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1141 |
Long Context Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen1.5-72B?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen1.5-72B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.