Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen1.5-72B
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 33.3 to 11.5.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1148 |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1164 |
Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 1159 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1110 |
Instruction Following Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1141 |
Long Context Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen1.5-72B?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen1.5-72B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.