Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Phi-4 Mini
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 37.0 to 28.1.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Phi-4 Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.075 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 10.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | — |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena French | 1286 | — |
| LMArena German | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1279 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Phi-4 Mini: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Phi-4 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Phi-4 Mini?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Phi-4 Mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.