Model comparison
Gemma 2B vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 47.3 to 24.0.
- Gemma 2B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2B: 29.4 (#305), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1010 | 1269 |
| HumanEval+ | 20.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 34.1% | — |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2B: 18.8 (#275), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 989 | 1255 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 35.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 94.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | 71.4% | — |
| PIQA | 77.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 65.4% | — |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2B: 30.0 (#239), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1009 | 1265 |
| GSM8K | 17.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2B: —, Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1238 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.1% | — |
| BoolQ | 69.4% | — |
| MMLU | 42.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | 53.2% | — |
Multilingual Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2B: 23.0 (#294), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 958 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 986 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 937 | 1261 |
| LMArena French | — | 1286 |
| LMArena German | — | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1195 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1279 |
Instruction Following Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2B: 48.5 (#302), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 970 | 1245 |
Long Context Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2B: 29.9 (#291), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 981 | 1266 |
Writing & Preference Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Gemma 2B: 24.0 (#308), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2B | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1002 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 987 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 945 | 1265 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2B better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2B or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2B and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2B has 23 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.