Model comparison
Granite 4.2 3b vs Yi-1.5-34B
Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 36.3 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 3b | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 30.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1306 | 1160 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 3b: —, Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1315 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1268 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1269 | 1213 |
| LMArena Russian | 1249 | 1091 |
| LMArena French | — | 1156 |
| LMArena German | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1005 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1121 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1273 | 1139 |
Long Context Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1291 | 1143 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 3b leads
Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 3b | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1293 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1205 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 3b or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Yi-1.5-34B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.