Model comparison
Grok 4 Fast vs Yi-1.5-34B
Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 7 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 34.6.
- Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4 Fast | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2025-09-19 | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 30 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1429 | 1169 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1159 | — |
| WeirdML | 42.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86), Yi-1.5-34B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | 15.7% | — |
| Cybench | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1412 | 1160 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 66.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 48.5% | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.2 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.5 | — |
Math Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1411 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 19.7% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1396 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1431 | 1156 |
| LMArena German | 1383 | 1111 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | 1021 |
| LMArena Korean | 1357 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1389 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | 1121 |
Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1139 |
Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1143 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 94.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4 Fast better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4 Fast or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (32.5 vs 32.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Yi-1.5-34B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.