Model comparison

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Yi-1.5-34B

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.2

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 35.4 to 14.8.

Side by side

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Olmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)01.AI
Noometry Index38.830.2
Released—2024-05-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1621

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding13461169
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts13221160

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math13051182
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Expert13071144
GPQA Diamond—32%

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English12751121
LMArena Chinese13041213
LMArena French13281155
LMArena German12831111
LMArena Korean12061005
LMArena Russian12681091
LMArena Spanish13371120
LMArena Japanese—1021

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following12981139

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query13121144

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text13111173
LMArena Creative Writing12641135
LMArena Multi-Turn13091153

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Yi-1.5-34B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper