Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Yi-1.5-34B
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 35.4 to 14.8.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 30.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-05-13 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1346 | 1169 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 43.8% |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | 1160 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1182 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 25.5% |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1307 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 32% |
Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | 1213 |
| LMArena French | 1328 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | 1283 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | 1005 |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | 1091 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1337 | 1120 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1021 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | 1139 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | 1144 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Yi-1.5-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1173 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1135 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | 1153 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Yi-1.5-34B?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Yi-1.5-34B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.