Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.7 to 35.6.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Granite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Max
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.051.4
Released—2026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding13631498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136), Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13081483
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.74

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
LMArena Math—1488

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert13131488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193), Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English12681475
LMArena Chinese12681533
LMArena Russian12491482

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12711460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query12931484

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text12951476
LMArena Creative Writing12151450
LMArena Multi-Turn12931482
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Qwen3.7 Max share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper