Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 36.3.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Granite 4.2 3bQwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.451.5
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked1129

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Coding13611471
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts13061457
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.24

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.6 Max Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
LMArena Math—1465
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Expert13151478
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English12681437
LMArena Chinese12691487
LMArena Russian12491445
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following12731438

Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query12911457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bQwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text12931447
LMArena Creative Writing12051435
LMArena Multi-Turn12901456

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper