Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 Fast vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 32.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 82.7% for Grok 4 Fast and 92.3% for Qwen3.7 Max.

Side by side

Grok 4 FastQwen3.7 Max
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.451.5
Released2025-09-192026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked3033

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkGrok 4 FastQwen3.7 Max
LMArena WebDev11591515
LMArena Coding14291498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
SciCode—48.8%
WeirdML42.9%—
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86), Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkGrok 4 FastQwen3.7 Max
τ²-bench Banking15.7%—
Cybench30%—
GBAEval—0.4%
LMArena Search1171—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok 4 FastQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14121483
DTBench82.7%92.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index144.2153.68
ARC-AGI-25.3%—
SimpleBench—70.4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
ARC-AGI-148.5%—
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
LMCA—44%
ForecastBench60.5—

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkGrok 4 FastQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math14191490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkGrok 4 FastQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert14111488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate19.7%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkGrok 4 FastQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English13961474
LMArena Chinese14571530
LMArena Russian13891484
LMArena French1431—
LMArena German1383—
LMArena Japanese1352—
LMArena Korean1357—
LMArena Spanish1415—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok 4 FastQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following13871460

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkGrok 4 FastQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query14151482
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkGrok 4 FastQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text14071476
LMArena Creative Writing13871449
LMArena Multi-Turn14141481
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 Fast better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 Fast or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Qwen3.7 Max share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper