Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 53.8 to 27.1.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Granite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.829.7
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1119

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding13961039
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13741028

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math—1089

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1406984

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13401000
LMArena Chinese14141016
LMArena Russian13431004
LMArena French—1039
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Spanish—1059

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13471023

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1359996

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text13611050
LMArena Creative Writing12881024
LMArena Multi-Turn1339989

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper