Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 18.3.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | — |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.