Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.7 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-08-10 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1039 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| SciCode | 44.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1396 | 1028 |
| CritPt | 2.6% | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1417 | 1089 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1386 | 984 |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1016 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1004 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1023 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1382 | 996 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1399 | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.