Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.8 to 18.3.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
ERNIE 5.0 0110OLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderBaiduAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index41.829.7
Released—2024-12-31
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2012

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1455—

Reasoning ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110OLMo 2 Furious 13B
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%—
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1445—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
LiveBench—22.1%

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1437—

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110OLMo 2 Furious 13B
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1428—

Multimodal Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Vision1249—

Multilingual Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1436—
LMArena Chinese1512—
LMArena French1467—
LMArena German1460—
LMArena Japanese1382—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Russian1446—
LMArena Spanish1473—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1413—

Long Context Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1422—

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1445—
LMArena Creative Writing1426—
WildBench—68.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn1434—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper