Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.4 to 53.8.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Granite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.1
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index41.849.9
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1137

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Coding13961498
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.1
APEX-Agents—31.8%
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Hard Prompts13741486
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.21

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.1
ProofBench—39%
LMArena Math—1483

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Expert14061478
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1293
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English13401472
LMArena Chinese14141518
LMArena Russian13431483
LMArena French—1494
LMArena German—1466
LMArena Japanese—1451
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Spanish—1464

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following13471457

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query13591462

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text13611479
LMArena Creative Writing12881437
LMArena Multi-Turn13391485
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper