Model comparison
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Granite 4.2 30b
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 50.8 to 39.1.
- Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.2 30b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 49.5 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2026-10-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1587 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1396 |
Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1374 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 30% | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Granite 4.2 30b: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 75.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | — |
Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads
Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 23.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1406 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Granite 4.2 30b: —
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 47.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1414 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1343 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1347 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1359 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 5.5 | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1339 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Granite 4.2 30b?
Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?
Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Granite 4.2 30b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.