Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 84.9% for Muse Spark 1.1.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Spark 1.1
ProviderBaiduMeta
Noometry Index41.849.9
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked2037

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Coding14551498
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Spark 1.1
APEX-Agents—31.8%
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Spark 1.1
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%84.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts14451486
CritPt—15.1%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.21

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Math14371483
ProofBench—39%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Expert14281478
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%

Multimodal Muse Spark 1.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision12491293
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English14361472
LMArena Chinese15121518
LMArena French14671494
LMArena German14601466
LMArena Japanese13821451
LMArena Korean14061458
LMArena Russian14461483
LMArena Spanish14731464

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following14131457

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query14221462

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text14451479
LMArena Creative Writing14261437
LMArena Multi-Turn14341485
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper