Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 53.8 to 27.6.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Granite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.827.9
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1135

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding13961093
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13741072
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LiveBench Math—15.7%
LMArena Math—1111

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14061045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13401021
LMArena Chinese14141021
LMArena Russian13431022
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13471053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13591044

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text13611073
LMArena Creative Writing12881037
LMArena Multi-Turn13391018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper