Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 38.7.
  • Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Grok 4 Fast specifications
Granite 4.1 8bGrok 4 Fast
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index37.439.4
Released—2025-09-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1330

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena WebDev11921159
LMArena Coding13121429
WeirdML—42.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4 Fast
τ²-bench Banking—15.7%
Cybench—30%
LMArena Search—1171

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts12931412
ARC-AGI-2—5.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.1%
ARC-AGI-1—48.5%
DTBench—82.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.2
ForecastBench—60.5

Math Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Math13121419

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Expert13091411
Vectara Hallucination Rate—19.7%

Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Non-English12611396
LMArena Chinese13371457
LMArena Russian12401389
LMArena French—1431
LMArena German—1383
LMArena Japanese—1352
LMArena Korean—1357
LMArena Spanish—1415

Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following12691387

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Longer Query12751415
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Text12901407
LMArena Creative Writing12511387
LMArena Multi-Turn12681414

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Grok 4 Fast?

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?

Grok 4 Fast scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Grok 4 Fast share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper