Model comparison

Grok 4 Fast vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 37.6.
  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4 Fast and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct specifications
Grok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
ProviderxAINVIDIA
Noometry Index39.437.6
Released2025-09-192024-12-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3014

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Coding14291272
LMArena WebDev1159—
WeirdML42.9%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—48.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
τ²-bench Banking15.7%—
Cybench30%—
LMArena Search1171—

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14121266
ARC-AGI-25.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.1%—
ARC-AGI-148.5%—
DTBench82.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.2—
ForecastBench60.5—

Math Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Math14191271

Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Expert14111242
Vectara Hallucination Rate19.7%—

Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13961245
LMArena Chinese14571263
LMArena Russian13891227
LMArena French1431—
LMArena German1383—
LMArena Japanese1352—
LMArena Korean1357—
LMArena Spanish1415—

Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13871252

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14151238
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Text14071283
LMArena Creative Writing13871269
LMArena Multi-Turn14141275

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 Fast better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 Fast or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper