Model comparison

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 Micro IBM

28.8

Rank #312 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 25.1 to 9.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 28.3% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 46.3% for Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 Micro and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Granite 4.0 MicroTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderIBMAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index28.832.6
Released2025-10-022024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output118K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.017—
Output $ / M tokens$0.11—
Results tracked814

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding—1236

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1220

Math Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.8%4.4%
Omni-MATH20.9%—
LMArena Math—1242
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond28.3%46.3%
MMLU-Pro39.5%—
GPQA (HELM)30.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English—1236
LMArena Chinese—1249
LMArena Russian—1246

Instruction Following Granite 4.0 Micro leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
IFEval84.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1233

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query—1224

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text—1256
LMArena Creative Writing—1231
WildBench67%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1252

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper