Model comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.1 to 9.9.
- Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 Micro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2025-10-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.017 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.11 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1389 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1384 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1375 |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.