Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 31.1.
  • Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.529.3
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1332

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding13901101
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13991100
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math14141151
LiveBench Math—17.6%

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert13951067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13951058
LMArena Chinese14251061
LMArena Korean1406894
LMArena Russian13851111
LMArena French—1135
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13741087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13841088

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text14011110
LMArena Creative Writing13921083
LMArena Multi-Turn13931068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper