Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

31.8

Rank #256 Confirmed

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.2

Rank #265 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 35.2 to 30.4.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index31.831.2
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked139

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Coding11861025

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts11461047

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Math11521072

Knowledge Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Expert1142—

Multilingual Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Non-English10991064
LMArena Chinese1145—
LMArena Russian1092—

Instruction Following Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Instruction Following11311061

Long Context Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Longer Query1162998

Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Text11501098
LMArena Creative Writing11291091
LMArena Multi-Turn11081058

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.9 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper