Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Falcon-180B and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.2 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 4 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 28.8 to 25.2.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 31.8 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1025 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1047 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1072 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1063 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1060 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 998 |
Writing & Preference Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1058 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Falcon-180B and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.2 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.