Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.6 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 34.5 to 29.7.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
ProviderIBMIBM
Noometry Index31.632.4
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding11121186
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10921145

Math Too close to call

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Math11431152

Knowledge Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert10871142

Multilingual Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10371099
LMArena Chinese10631145
LMArena Russian10601092

Instruction Following Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10881131

Long Context Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11221162

Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGranite 3.1 8b Instruct
LMArena Text10961150
LMArena Creative Writing10711129
LMArena Multi-Turn10631108

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.6 vs 32.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper