Model comparison
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Yi-34B
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-34B in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 30.8 to 7.5.
Side by side
| Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 27.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | 1112 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | 1104 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1139 | 1176 |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | 1050 |
| LMArena French | — | 1081 |
| LMArena German | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 959 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |
Instruction Following Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1091 |
Long Context Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Yi-34B?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Yi-34B better for coding?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Yi-34B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.