Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Yi-34B
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 29.9 to 7.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 01.AI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 27.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1112 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1104 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1081 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1070 |
Instruction Following Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1091 |
Long Context Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Yi-34B?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Yi-34B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (32.3 vs 32.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Yi-34B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.