Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 57.7 to 47.7.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Granite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index33.227.9
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1235

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding11491093
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11381072
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math11591111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert11311045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10681021
LMArena Chinese11391021
LMArena Russian10631022
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11161053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11551044

Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text11271073
LMArena Creative Writing11161037
LMArena Multi-Turn10991018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper