Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 58.0 to 34.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Granite 3.1 2b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.243.0
Released—2025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked1225

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding11491440

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11381428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math11591440
Omni-MATH—46.7%

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Expert11311417
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English10681407
LMArena Chinese11391460
LMArena Russian10631404
LMArena French—1413
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1395
LMArena Korean—1364
LMArena Spanish—1435

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11161389
IFEval—81%

Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11551403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text11271417
LMArena Creative Writing11161334
LMArena Multi-Turn10991416
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper