Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 38.8 to 22.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA (HELM): 43.7% for Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and 63% for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2024-05-14 | 2025-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 42 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 34.4 (#236), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1261 | 1440 |
| WeirdML | 24.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 67.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.6 (#102), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 14.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 21.7 (#215), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1428 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.7% |
| DTBench | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.36 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.9 | — |
| PIQA | 87.5% | — |
Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 22.1 (#281), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 30.4% | 46.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1440 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 61.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#260), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 67.8% | 78.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 43.7% | 63% |
| LMArena Expert | 1233 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| BoolQ | 85.8% | — |
| MMLU | 77.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 36.0 (#81), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1141 | — |
| Video-MME | 70.3% | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 42.9 (#189), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1278 | 1407 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1295 | 1460 |
| LMArena French | 1258 | 1413 |
| LMArena German | 1262 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1252 | 1395 |
| LMArena Korean | 1221 | 1364 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1243 | 1435 |
Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 66.8 (#205), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.1% | 81% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1258 | 1389 |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#187), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1284 | 1403 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 55.6% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.7 (#196), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | 1334 |
| WildBench | 79.2% | 80.7% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | 1416 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.
Related comparisons
- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10
- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs MiMo-V2-Pro
- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Claude Opus 4
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview