Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 Amazon

43.0

Rank #101 Confirmed

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 58.8 to 34.1.
  • Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
ProviderAmazonIBM
Noometry Index43.033.2
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.3 (#107), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Coding14331149

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 29.1 (#95), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14221138

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.1 (#114), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Math14311159

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.9 (#127), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Expert14311131

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 51.9 (#98), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14051068
LMArena Chinese14631139
LMArena Russian13941063
LMArena French1449—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.2 (#122), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13871116

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#121), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13951155

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 58.8 (#114), Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Granite 3.1 2b Instruct
LMArena Text14151127
LMArena Creative Writing13491116
LMArena Multi-Turn13801099

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper